Expro Excellence
Petroleum Engineering Solutions
Well integrity review of aging wells
Customer challenges
  • An operator wanted to perform a comprehensive well integrity review targeting 10% across 700 onshore wells and 200 offshore wells
  • With a portfolio containing aging wells (field development was in 1935), a number of these had significant annulus pressures, pronounced surface and subsurface corrosion, and visible surface leakage
  • The well stock comprised of subsea wells, oil and gas producers, gas injector, water injector and observation wells

Requirements:

  • Identify potential of integrity failures
  • Review casing and cementing practices with a view to improving integrity
  • Develop effective, practical and fit-for-purpose integrity management and procedures
  • Evaluate the barrier philosophy to maintain barrier integrity
Expro Excellence
  • A dedicated team of three engineers were assigned to the clients offices in the Middle East with the primary responsibility of gathering data and information on each of the 900 wells and subsequently rank them in accordance to their susceptibility to failure
  • Rankings were performed by assigning quantitative values to the following criteria: presence of A, B, C annulus pressures; age of well; acuifers transversed; well type (injector/producer); water cut; production rates; GOR; number of casing; natural flowing or artificially lifted; WHP, well status (shut-in/flowing) wells were then classified into low, medium or high hazard wells
  • A total of 120 wells were selected as a representative sample of the three hazard classifications and a comprehensive well-by-well integrity review was undertaken according to the requirements of the scope of work
  • Throughout the project, continuous technical support and input was provided by the EGIS subsurface engineering team
Value to client
  • A well-by-well review identifying potential subsurface leaks and failures - the results of the sample saw 5% of wells fall into the high risk category, 75% into the medium risk category, and 15% into the low risk category
  • Current practices were reviewed, and subsequently comprehensive wellhead maintenance, integrity management and annulus pressure monitoring plans were put in place
  • An analysis of current cementing practices and recommendations on possible improvements
  • A subsurface safety valve (SSSV) review based on proximity to populated areas
  • Implementation of the recommended integrity management procedures
  • Remedial action on high and medium risk wells were recorded in Expro's SafeWells well integrity software to allow for future maintenance to be scheduled
Contact

Well integrity review of aging wells

In Brief
Expro performs well integrity review of aging wells and develops comprehensive wellhead maintenance, integrity management and annulus pressure monitoring plans for client in Middle East
Product Line
  • Petroleum Engineering Solutions
Region
Middle East And North Africa
Customer challenges
  • An operator wanted to perform a comprehensive well integrity review targeting 10% across 700 onshore wells and 200 offshore wells
  • With a portfolio containing aging wells (field development was in 1935), a number of these had significant annulus pressures, pronounced surface and subsurface corrosion, and visible surface leakage
  • The well stock comprised of subsea wells, oil and gas producers, gas injector, water injector and observation wells

Requirements:

  • Identify potential of integrity failures
  • Review casing and cementing practices with a view to improving integrity
  • Develop effective, practical and fit-for-purpose integrity management and procedures
  • Evaluate the barrier philosophy to maintain barrier integrity
Expro Excellence
  • A dedicated team of three engineers were assigned to the clients offices in the Middle East with the primary responsibility of gathering data and information on each of the 900 wells and subsequently rank them in accordance to their susceptibility to failure
  • Rankings were performed by assigning quantitative values to the following criteria: presence of A, B, C annulus pressures; age of well; acuifers transversed; well type (injector/producer); water cut; production rates; GOR; number of casing; natural flowing or artificially lifted; WHP, well status (shut-in/flowing) wells were then classified into low, medium or high hazard wells
  • A total of 120 wells were selected as a representative sample of the three hazard classifications and a comprehensive well-by-well integrity review was undertaken according to the requirements of the scope of work
  • Throughout the project, continuous technical support and input was provided by the EGIS subsurface engineering team
Value to client
  • A well-by-well review identifying potential subsurface leaks and failures - the results of the sample saw 5% of wells fall into the high risk category, 75% into the medium risk category, and 15% into the low risk category
  • Current practices were reviewed, and subsequently comprehensive wellhead maintenance, integrity management and annulus pressure monitoring plans were put in place
  • An analysis of current cementing practices and recommendations on possible improvements
  • A subsurface safety valve (SSSV) review based on proximity to populated areas
  • Implementation of the recommended integrity management procedures
  • Remedial action on high and medium risk wells were recorded in Expro's SafeWells well integrity software to allow for future maintenance to be scheduled
Contact

For further information, please contact:

expro.website@expro.com